In another blazing display of blind justice, the
Despite the fact that no evidence for sexual or physical abuse has been presented, the CPS maintains that the removal of the children was justified because the children could not be protected from possible future abuse. Based on this impeccable logic, every child in
By the way, CPS might have neglected to mention that in 2005 the number of children in
Now the
Maybe the real crime is the dresses that the girls have to wear. It makes me wonder if the girls in the compound were walking around in short-shorts and halter tops, would anyone have noticed that something was amiss? Right now, parents across the country are watching this story unfold in the news, shaking their heads and saying, “if only they had had their babies out of wedlock like everyone else…”
I find it interesting that nobody has tried to prosecute the men for violating polygamy laws, nor has the state been able to produce a single witness that can testify to any of the spurious abuse charges that have been alleged. The entire case boils down to, “well, no young girl would want to engage in a plural marriage right? So, it must be sexual abuse, right?”
Is the FLDS an odd religion that encourages people to do things that clash with the social norm, telling them that their salvation is dependant upon doing certain things that the rest of society thinks is kind of nuts? Absolutely. Is it true that there are people who have left the FLDS church and have gone on record talking about how evil it is? Without a doubt. Is it possible that there are people in the FLDS community who only stay in because they do not want to disappoint family and friends that they have known their entire lives? I am sure that there are. While members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints might not agree with the religious beliefs of the FLDS church, surely we can recognize the similarities between their situation and our own. After all, it wasn’t that long ago that we were expelled from our homes and forced across the country to seek refuge in the west, burying our family members along the way.
Last time I checked, we lived in a country that allowed men and women to practice any religion they wanted, and there was this little thing called “burden of proof”. I also seem to remember hearing a phrase “innocent until proven guilty”. In
Thankfully, that kind of justice only applies to you if you are FLDS, so the rest of us do not have to worry about our children being stripped away from us.
5 comments:
hey chris,
this is darin. I am glad that you sent me this email, with you blog link to it. i love hearing peoples oppinions, especially strong willed ones such as yourself. They get me to think about a subject at an angle that i may not have done before. keep em coming
see ya
darin
Hey Chris,
This is Alan. Excellent blog. This is quality op-ed material. You should get this put in the NYtimes of SLtrib. If you don't mind I'm kind to print this out and make all my friends read it.
Would your article change at all knowing that some of the children are starting to tell the truth, exposing the abuse and criminal behavior that has been going on at the FLDS encampment?
Responding to the comment: "Would your article change at all knowing that some of the children are starting to tell the truth, exposing the abuse and criminal behavior that has been going on at the FLDS encampment?"
If any child in any community is being abused, then the people responsible need to be punished. However even people guilty of the most heinous crimes have a constitutional right to due process. This has been overlooked entirely in the case of the FLDS church. If any child has been abused, send in investigators, build a case, convict the criminal. Warren Jeffs went to jail because someone was courageous enough to come forward. However, I have not yet heard any reports of any member of the compound admitting to being abused (if I am wrong, please send me the link.) Does that mean that abuse is not occurring? Absolutely not. It does mean, however, that there is no justification for action on the government. The government should not be able to take your children away because they "might could possibly maybe be abused at some time in their lives". Ask yourselves this, what if this were any other group besides the FLDS? What if these people were Baptists, and there had been reports of some baptists beating their wives or abusing their children, would the state be justified in confiscating every baptist child in order to protect them from "possible" future abuse. These people are being singled out because they dress funny. Simple as that.
I honestly don't understand how the FLDS people expected to have religious freedom in the South. In Missouri it was legal to kill mormons until the 1970's.
Post a Comment